| Authors | مرتضی مزگی نژاد |
| Journal | منطق پژوهی |
| Page number | 287-311 |
| Serial number | ۱۲ |
| Volume number | ۴ |
| Paper Type | Full Paper |
| Published At | ۲۰۲۱ |
| Journal Type | Typographic |
| Journal Country | Iran, Islamic Republic Of |
| Journal Index | isc |
| Keywords | narrowest possibility, future possibility, (Ibn Sīnā's) Avicenna, Al, Isharat wa’l, Tanbihat, Mantiq Al, Mashriqiyin. |
|---|
Abstract
Abstract
Avicenna (Ibn Sīnā's) discusses in detail the modality and modal syllogistic, in his logical
books. The earliest formal system of modal logic was developed by Avicenna, who
ultimately developed a theory of "temporally modal" syllogistic. However, referring to his
works, there is a kind of ambiguity in the meaning of narrowest possibility. Some Western
logicians have also reported such ambiguity, sometimes leading to misunderstandings.
Therefore, knowing the exact meaning of the narrowest possibility from Avicenna's
perspective is important. In the book of Healing (Kitāb al-Shifā, Kitāb al-Burhan), it
becomes clear that his definition of the narrowest possibility is the same as the definition of
a future possibility. In the book of Oriental logic (Mantiq Al-Mashriqiyin) and the book of
Pointers (Al-Isharat wa’l-Tanbihat), the narrowest possibility and future possibility are
defined separately, but the definitions provided do not completely coincide. Two strategies
will be proposed to resolve this ambiguity. Finally, it seems that there is no real distinction
between the narrowest possibility and future possibility. That is, the distinction between
these two possibilities depends solely on whether it is a consideration for the future or not.