| Authors | Hossein Navidinia,Adrian Naznean,Maha Sourani, |
| Journal | Asia-Pacific Education Researcher |
| Page number | 1-11 |
| Serial number | 33 |
| Volume number | 1 |
| IF | 0.958 |
| Paper Type | Full Paper |
| Published At | 2024 |
| Journal Grade | ISI |
| Journal Type | Typographic |
| Journal Country | Iran, Islamic Republic Of |
| Journal Index | JCR،Scopus |
Abstract
Online teaching has gained more momentum
since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. While this
mode offers many benefits, one major concern is maintaining academic integrity, as online instruction can provide more opportunities for cheating. This study aimed
to explore students’ attitudes toward cheating in online
assessments (OAs) and any potential differences based on
gender and nationality. Since our purpose was to perform
a cross-cultural examination of cheating behaviors in an
academic environment, we conducted the study in culturally diverse countries. The participants were 629 university
students from Iran, Romania, and Lebanon. They completed
a questionnaire about academic integrity in OAs. The results
showed that 60% of the participants had no negative views
on cheating in OAs, 58.5% admitted to cheating in OAs
themselves, and 85% viewed OAs as less reliable than inperson assessments. During OAs, the most common ways of cheating included using notes on paper, relying on course
materials, and sharing answers through social media and
messaging apps. The main motivations for cheating included
stress, time constraints, and the desire to achieve a higher
grade, while factors that deterred cheating included moral
and social stigma and the rights of other students. The study
found no significant difference in attitudes toward cheating
in OAs between male and female participants, but there were
significant differences between students of different nationalities (p < 0.05).
Paper URL