| نویسندگان | MOHAMMAD FOOLADINASRABAD,Mohsen Pourreza-Bilondi,Mahna Javaheri |
| نشریه | مدلسازی مدیریت آب و خاک |
| شماره صفحات | 215-232 |
| شماره سریال | 5 |
| شماره مجلد | 1 |
| نوع مقاله | Full Paper |
| تاریخ انتشار | 2025 |
| نوع نشریه | الکترونیکی |
| کشور محل چاپ | ایران |
| نمایه نشریه | isc |
چکیده مقاله
Climate change requires a precise analysis of local data, and statistical downscaling using machine learning
algorithms such as XGBoost can enhance the spatial accuracy of General Circulation Models (GCMs). This
study examined the performance of XGBoost in the daily downscaling of temperature and relative humidity at
the synoptic station of Kermanshah during the period from 1990 to 2014. In order to investigate the performance
of the XGBoost model in downscaling the climate variables of temperature and relative humidity, local and
large-scale data were divided into two training and testing sections, so that the years 1990 to 2007 were
considered as the training section and the years 2007 to 2015 were considered as the testing section. The present
research showed that the XGBoost algorithm, as one of the advanced machine learning methods, performed very
well in downscaling climatic parameters, especially temperature, and to some extent relative humidity. To
evaluate the model's performance, the metric values were examined separately in two sections: training and
testing. For temperature using ECMWF-ERA5 data, the KGE, NSE, and R² values in the training section were
0.98, 0.98, and 0.99, respectively. For temperature using MPI-ESM1-2-HR data, the values of these metrics in
the training section were 0.93, 0.94, and 0.97, and in the testing section, they were 0.91, 0.88, and 0.94,
respectively. Additionally, for relative humidity using ECMWF-ERA5 data, the metric values in the training
section were 0.82, 0.93, and 0.97, and in the testing section, they were 0.7, 0.72, and 0.87. Finally, for relative
humidity using MPI-ESM1-2-HR data, the values of these metrics in the training section were 0.72, 0.67, and
0.82, and in the testing section, they were 0.70, 0.65, and 0.81. Graphical analyses confirmed the superiority of
the model in simulating intermediate and extreme temperature values, especially with ECMWF-ERA5, but
limitations in reproducing extreme values were observed in relative humidity
لینک ثابت مقاله