| Authors | Abbas Saberi noughabi,Mahmood Beyki |
| Journal | Electric Power Systems Research |
| Page number | 1-7 |
| Serial number | 253 |
| Volume number | 1 |
| IF | 2.688 |
| Paper Type | Full Paper |
| Published At | 2026 |
| Journal Grade | ISI |
| Journal Type | Electronic |
| Journal Country | Iran, Islamic Republic Of |
| Journal Index | JCR،Scopus |
| Keywords | Optimal design Transformer neutral grounding system Genetic algorithm |
|---|
Abstract
Grounding systems are essential for ensuring the safety, reliability and efficiency of electrical networks. These
systems act as the backbone for protecting equipment and personnel by managing fault currents, reducing over
voltages and maintaining stable operating conditions in power systems. In this paper, the problem of transformer
neutral grounding system design is formulated as an optimization problem. The goal is to optimally select the
type of neutral grounding system and optimize its impedance value. The objective function of the problem is
defined as the weighted sum of ground current, ground voltage, healthy phase voltages, voltage unbalance
percentage, and total harmonic distortion percentage. Given the objective function and proposed constraints, the
transformer neutral grounding system design problem is presented as a nonlinear optimization problem and
solved using the genetic algorithm with two selection methods: roulette wheel and Tournament selection.
Simulation results showed that under conditions where the importance of all parameters in the objective function
is considered equally, the frequency-selective grounding (FSG) system is the best option for the power system
under study. This neutral grounding system provides optimal performance not only for different types of loads
connected to the system but also for various values of ground fault resistance. The objective function values
converged to similar values in both genetic algorithm selection methods; this demonstrates that the genetic
algorithm was able to find nearly identical optimal points with both selection methods.
Paper URL