| Authors | masome vale |
| Conference Title | بیست و هشتمین سمینار شیمی تجزیه انجمن شیمی ایران |
| Holding Date of Conference | 2025-01-29 |
| Event Place | مشهد |
| Page number | 0-0 |
| Presentation | POSTER |
| Conference Level | Internal Conferences |
Abstract
In recent years, the development of fast, accurate, and sensitive methods has
become a critical topic of interest. However, despite advancements in this field, precise
analytical tools for determining the endpoints of analytes in biological, environmental, and
pharmaceutical samples are often unavailable. This limitation is particularly notable before
sampling for the extraction, separation, and pre-concentration of analytes in complex matrices,
as most analytical tools cannot directly handle such matrices [1]. Therefore, a sample
preparation step is typically required. One of the commonly used sample preparation methods
is extraction. In this study, the electro-membrane micro-extraction (EME) method was
proposed for the measurement and concentration of Amoxicillin in real samples. During the
extraction process, the electrode reaction takes place directly in the solution, and variables such
as EME (solution volume, extraction time, and electrical current) and electrolyte concentration
are influenced by pH values [2]. Variations in pH are especially significant for the acceptor
solutions, as their volume is smaller compared to donor solutions. In this method, the
membrane was prepared using agarose, polyacrylamide, and acetic acid. The results
demonstrated the success of this method. The optimal conditions for the concentration step
were determined as follows: 1% agarose (w/v), 3% polyacrylamide (w/v), 0.15% acetic acid
(v/v), donor and acceptor phase pH values of 3 and 9, respectively, an applied voltage of 60 V,
and an extraction time of 40 minutes. The drug extraction process using the proposed method
was conducted under optimal conditions. Additionally, the precision of the method was
evaluated under these conditions with three repetitions in one day, yielding a relative standard
deviation (RSD) of 2.10%. The method exhibited linearity in the range of 0.1–7.5 μg/mL. The
limits of detection (LOD) and
Paper URL