نویسندگان | Mohammad Mahdi Shariat Bagheri,Samaneh Khazaei,Houshang Garavand |
---|---|
نشریه | Journal of Affective Disorders |
شماره صفحات | 756-762 |
شماره سریال | 339 |
شماره مجلد | 339 |
نوع مقاله | Full Paper |
تاریخ انتشار | 2023 |
رتبه نشریه | ISI |
نوع نشریه | الکترونیکی |
کشور محل چاپ | ایران |
نمایه نشریه | JCR،Scopus |
چکیده مقاله
Background Anhedonia and rumination are mental disorders' transdiagnostic features but remain difficult to treat. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a proven treatment for depression, but its effects on anhedonia and rumination and whether anhedonia and rumination can be used as a predictive biomarker of treatment response is not well known. This study aimed to investigate the tDCS efficacy and identify the predictive role of anhedonia and rumination in response to tDCS in patients with MDD. Methods 182 patients received 10 tDCS sessions delivered at 2 mA to left (anode) dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17), Snaith–Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS), and the 10-item Ruminative Response Scale (RRS-10) was administered to patients with MDD before treatment, following it, and after two weeks of tDCS. Results There was an overall significant improvement in anhedonia from pre- to post-treatment. Regression analyses revealed that responders had higher baseline anhedonia and rumination (reflective pondering) scores. We found that the reduction in HRSD scores after tDCS was significantly associated with anhedonia's baseline values while no relation was found between baseline rumination and tDCS treatment response. Conclusion These results provide new evidence that pronounced anhedonia may be a significant clinical predictor of response to tDCS. Patients with severe or low baseline rumination had an equal chance of achieving clinical response. Prospective tDCS studies are necessary to validate the predictive value of the derived model.
tags: Anhedonia, Depression, Rumination, Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) Treatment response